|
Getting Around the Universe
Synopsis: Alien Interstellar Space Travel: A review of interstellar space travel theory including the physics of alien interstellar space travel and alleged UFO abduction cases such as that of Betty and Barney Hill.
Mankind first
transmitted a dedicated radio message to the stars at 5pm on 16th
November 1974 from a radio telescope situated in Arecibo in Puerto Rico (left),
although other radio and television transmissions had been drifting into space
for decades; the inadvertent result of normal terrestrial broadcasting. The
message sent was a three-minute signal targeted towards a group of stars 24,000
light years away and was primarily intended to be a demonstration that
terrestrial radio astronomy had reached a level that would allow interstellar
radio communication over vast distances.
The event was also significant, for by sending such a message,
the scientists involved were also signalling that they believed there was (or
is) some intelligent life ‘out there’ to receive and respond to their call. So, what is the possibility of life out there trying to make
contact with a race on this planet (I say race, as it cannot be assumed that it
is humanity that any ‘aliens’ may be wishing to contact.)
Frank Drake produced a formula in 1961 that could be used to
calculate an answer:
N = R x Fp x Ne x F1 x Fi x Fc x
L
Actually, the formula doesn’t give an answer as such, for any
number generated can only be based on the numbers attributed to each part of the
formula. That said, essentially it works like this:
Drake (right)
determined that N signifies the number of civilisations in our galaxy
attempting to make contact.
R stands for the average rate of star
formulation and based on observations from the Hubble telescope this is
generally accepted to be around ten stars each year.
|
|
Fp is the fraction of stars
that could contain planetary systems and whilst this is much debate about this,
a figure of one in ten is not unreasonable. Next Ne signifies the number
of these planets that are Earth-like. Based on our own solar system, this could
be determined as 1.
F1 stands for the fraction of
these Earth-like planets on which life could develop. This is fairly
straightforward, either life develops or it doesn’t therefore F1 is
either 1 or 0. If 0, then the overall formula will always generate a figure of
zero as well. We will accept the view expressed by Professor Jesco Puttkamer,
former Senior Staff Scientist of Advanced Programmes of Space Flight, NASA, who,
when asked "Could you give me a clear mathematical probability of the existence
of life in outer space?" replied "One … one is certainty." (1) We also now not
only believe their might have been life on Mars, but the moons of Jupiter are
also being suggested as probable homes for possible micro-organisms) so F1 will be 1.
Fi is the fraction of these
planets where life has become intelligent. On Earth there are a number of
intelligent species, so applying this to Drake’s formula, a number between 1 and
4 could be used. Conservatively, this will be determined as 1 (representing
humanity on Earth.)
Fc refers to the number of these
species that actually want to communicate with us. We are now purely in the
realms of speculation, but for arguments sake, it will be assumed perhaps 1 in
10 of these species would want to talk generating a figure of 0.1 for Fc.
Finally L represents the
lifetime of a civilisation (in years). The first part of this book demonstrated
how civilisations can rise and fall, but we will use a figure of 5000 years –
from the founding of Egypt to the present day when we are able to transmit
signals to the stars (although hopefully mankind will survive somewhat
longer.)
|
Using these figures,
the formula calculates that N, (the number of
advanced civilisations wanting to make contact) is 10 x 0.1 x 1 x 1 x 0.1 x
5000. This suggests that there are 500 civilisations in this galaxy alone (one
galaxy in a universe of 100 billion) who may be trying to contact us.
Having calculated the number of races that might be trying to
contact us, the next question is, how could they reach us? Albert Einstein
advises us that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light (E=MC2) and
late twentieth century space missions to the nine known planets of the Solar
System have revealed no signs of intelligent life there. Therefore, any one
visiting us must be travelling from outside the Solar System, yet the distances
involved suggest that such travel is not achievable.
S pace is so infinite that it is measured in ‘light years’;
that is, the time it would take light to travel any given distance. Light
travels at 186,000 miles a second, meaning that light could travel round the
planet Earth seven times in one second.
It takes 2.5 seconds for light to go to the Moon and back, and eight and a half
minutes to travel from the Sun to Earth. It takes light five hours to travel
from the Sun to the furthest planet Pluto and to the nearest star 4.3 years.
Thereafter, the time periods appear to
preclude the possibility of travel, taking 30,000 years for light to reach the
centre of our galaxy; 100,000 years to cross the galaxy, and to reach our
nearest galaxy, Andromeda (right) light takes 2.2 million years.
Finally, for light to travel to the furthest known point in the universe it
would take fifteen billion years (and the universe is still expanding at
an accelerating rate.)
But just as Einstein’s equation confined man to never travel at
more than the speed of light, his theories on time dilation opened up other
possibilities of interstellar travel. Einstein demonstrated that as the
traveller speeds up, time for him/her slows down. As Michael White, science
editor of ‘GQ’ explains, "if we imagine for a moment a journey of 50
light years from the alien’s home world to Earth.
At 0.95c (95% the speed of
light), this will take 47.5 years to complete, one way. 47.5 years to
the people back home, that is. Because of the consequence of special
relativity that, as we travel faster, relative time slows, to the crew
of the spaceship, this 47.5 years will only be 14.8 years." (2) |
Scientist Stanton B
Friedman, along with co-author B Ann Slate, applied this science to establish
whether or not claims made by two American so-called ‘abductees’ could be of any
substance.
Betty and Barney Hill (left) alleged that they had been taken
on board a UFO whilst out driving through the White Mountains in New Hampshire
in September 1961. Check out more of their story here.
They later sought professional assistance to resolve personal
difficulties that later surfaced and during regression, undertaken by
psychiatrist and neurologist Dr Benjamin Simon, the Hills revealed that they
believed they believed they had been taken on board a space craft where they had
undergone a detailed physical examination. Following this examination, Betty
Hill claimed that a crew-member of the spacecraft had shown her a star map of
what were supposedly trade routes and "paths of exploration". During further
hypnosis in 1964 Betty Hill reproduced this alleged ‘star map’ as a drawing
(right).
Unfortunately or
perhaps fortunately for Betty if they story was fabricated, no-one could
recognise the star chart she had drawn and it therefore neither helped prove nor
disprove the story. However an American schoolteacher, Marjorie Fish, undertook
the mammoth task of attempting to identify which stars Betty’s map could have
represented. She constructed three dimensional models of all stars within
approximately sixty light years of our own sun, and in July 1969, some five
years following the original ‘abduction’, Fish came across a nine star pattern
that appeared to represent the star chart drawn by Betty Hill.
Additional support for the Hill claims came in 1969 when a revised
star catalogue was issued. This catalogue containing information that appeared
to confirm the Hill’s original story, for three of the stars shown on Hill and
Fisher’s maps were not known to anybody on Earth at the time of the alleged
abduction. (These stars were called named Gliese 86.1, 95 and
97.) This information suggested that the ‘aliens’ who ‘abducted’ the
Hills were from Zeta 1 Reticuli and Zeta 2 Reticuli (the 12th and
13th nearest stars to our Sun), some 176,340,000m miles away. Quite
why they should travel 37 light years and simply want to subject Betty and
Barney Hill to a medical examination, have a chat around a star map, then dump
them back on Earth, has never been adequately explained, but then, hey, maybe
these aliens have got another set of values.
Seriously though, there is no reason to believe that we would
ever be able to actually communicate with any such aliens should they manage to
reach us. Even on Earth we share the planet with other life forms that are
acknowledged as being ‘intelligent’. Yet, to date, we have not been able to
achieve any real communication outside Hollywood remakes of 1970s Australian
television shows and US science fiction programmes.
|
In any event, once the home star system had been identified,
Friedman and Slate set to work. "What this implies," they concluded, "is that
the Reticulan crew would not have had to be going faster than the speed of light
to pay a visit to our solar system and return facing the prospect of residence
in a home for the elderly. Using Einstein’s time-change factor, a one way trip
at 80% of the speed of light at a constant velocity would take them 22 years. At
99% of the speed of light, it would take them five years and two months, but at
99.9% of that velocity, the trip could be made in only twenty months." (3)
Their calculations for the amount of time the journey
would have taken may be correct, but they had forgotten that travelling at the
speed of light brings about its own problems.
Stephen Hawking (right) explains: "Because of the equivalence of energy and
mass, the energy which an object has due to its motion, will add to its mass. In
other words, it will make it harder to increase its speed. This effect is only
really significant for objects moving at the speed of light.
For example, at 10% of the speed of light, an object’s mass is only 0.5% more
than normal, while at 90% of the speed of light it would be twice its normal
mass. As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass rises ever more
quickly, so it takes more and more energy to speed it up further.
"It can in fact never reach the speed of
light, because by then its mass would have become infinite, and by the
equivalence of mass and energy, it would have taken an infinite amount of energy
to get there. For this reason, any normal object is forever confined by
relativity to move at speeds slower than the speed of light. Only light, or other waves that have no
intrinsic mass, can move at the speed of light." (4)
And there are other complications to this
travel. As White points out; "even if we assume alien longevity is greater than
ours… crews sent out on round trips of almost a century might return to their
home worlds to find the political structure changed.
The organisation that sent them may no
longer exist. Such a crew would find all their relatives either dead or ancient,
and almost everything once familiar, irreversibly altered. Imagine a human able
to set out on a mission in the year 1900 returning to Earth in 1997.
They would have aged less than thirty years,
but the world would be almost unrecognisable to them." (5)
So, it would appear that such travel is less
than likely, but then, as science appears to close one door, it offers new
opportunities. One such opportunity could be ‘wormholes’.
This idea was first proposed by Kip Thorne
and Michael Morris in 1987 in the American Journal of Physics as a ‘follow
through’ of previous work by Albert Einstein.
|
TAGS: Alien Interstellar Space Travel, Review Alien Interstellar Space, Alien Interstellar Space Travel Theory, Physics of Alien Interstellar Space Travel, UFO Abduction Cases, Betty and Barney Hill 
 |