|
Secrets of the Third Reich
Synopsis: German Flying Saucers: Amongst Nazi war secrets were the development of German flying saucers or flying disks, further developed by German scientists who entered the USA under Operation Paperclip.
Part
III
Another scientist who brought new knowledge to America was
Viktor Schauberger. Although there is no evidence that Schauberger had Nazi
sympathies, he was viewed by the Americans as a collaborator and put ‘into
protective custody’ for six months at the end of the war.
Dr Walter Miethe, and Rudolph Schriever also entered America
under Operation Paperclip, however it is believed that their colleague Habermohl
fell into Russian hands. Whilst in the US, Miethe continued his ‘flying disk’ work
working primarily for the US Air Force, however he was sub-contracted to A. V.
Roe and Company.
In 1959 Jack Judges, a freelance cameraman was flying over this
company’s plant in Canada when he saw and photographed this picture (left) of a
disk shaped craft sitting on the ground. After the photograph was published in the papers, speculation
grew that the disk was a secret weapon, and one that may have accounted for many
of the UFO sightings during previous years.
In response to the speculation, the US Air Force released the
following official photograph of the craft. It was called the ‘Avro’ and had
first been launched in 1955.
A CIA memo of that year confirmed that the craft was based work undertaken by
German scientists, notably Miethe, during WWII. The design was later abandoned
in the late 1960s with the Air Force maintaining it was still at an experimental
stage when abandoned. The 1990s were to reveal the craft was part of the secret
‘Project Silver Bug’, a project to develop a craft that had VTOL
(vertical take-off and landing) capabilities that would dispense with the need
for runways – and reduce the risks of such runways been targets of attack thus
immobilising any aircraft that may rely on it.
|
|
Other German scientists similarly brought their expertise
– and designs – into the US after the war. ‘America’s Aircraft Year Book’
notes how many of them worked at Ft. Bliss (von Braun et al above) and Wright
Field:- the first and second homes of the Roswell wreckage. Among those in the
German group at Wright Field were Rudolph Hermann, Alexander Lippisch, Heinz
Schmitt, Helmut Heinrich, Fritz Doblhoff and Ernst Zundel.
Hermann was attached to the Peenemunde Research Station for
Aerodynamics where Germany’s V-2 rockets were hatched and launched against
England. A specialist in supersonics, he was in charge of the supersonic wind
tunnel at Kochel in the Bavarian Alps. He was also a member of the group
entrusted with Hitler’s futuristic plans to establish a space-station
rocket-refuelling bases revolving as a satellite about the Earth at a distance
of 4,000 miles – a scheme which he and certain high ranking AAF officers in 1947
still believed possible."
One of these scientists Dr. Alexander Lippisch had designed
another German craft that could be mistaken at the time for a flying disc,
certainly at least when viewed from the side.
Lippisch had developed a number of projects leading up to
the war, having been inspired by witnessing a flight by Orville Wright in
September 1909 when a boy of 14. By November 1944, Lippisch, along with his
students, had constructed the DM-1 (left), a delta with 60° swept leading edges.
This craft was later to be flown at a speed of 497mph under the power of a
rocket motor, and was shipped back to the US at the end of the war along with
its creator. The DM-1 was to inspire the design of many US delta-wing aircraft
such as the F-102 and F-104.
Lippisch joined Collins Radio Company as an expert on special
aeronautical problems and in 1966 founded the ‘Lippisch Corporation’. He went on
to develop the X-113A Aerofoil Boat before dying in 1976 at the age of 81.
Another craft that looked suspiciously like a ‘flying disk’ was
the AS-6. This craft was built by Arthur Sack following encouragement from Ernst
Udet, Germany’s Air Minister in 1939.
Constructed at the Mitteldeutsche Motorwerke Company, and
completed at the Flugplatz-Werkstatt at the Brandis Air Base in early 1944, the
plane was not a success, and not further developed.
A similar craft to the AS-6, the V-173, was built by
‘Chance-Vought’, and known as the ‘flying pancake’. The V-173 has the honour of
being the one occasion that the US authorities actually ‘admitted’ that
technologies developed in Germany during the war years could account for the
wave of UFOs seen over America in the 1940s.
The Navy released this picture of a V-173 in 1947 during the
wave of UFO excitement generated by Kenneth Arnold’s sighting and the headline
of the saucer crash at Roswell.
The Navy stated that the V-173 was the only craft in
operation at that time that could in any way come close to the flying disks
being sighted everywhere.
|
Certainly the V-173, or another development at Chance-Vought
was mistaken for a UFO by a local resident Thomas C. Smith whilst working for
the company a year before the famous Roswell incident.
In 1997 Smith disclosed his story which appeared in the
Lancaster New Era newspaper in Lancaster, Pennsylvania on 12th July,
1997. In the article Smith stated he had seen a flying saucer, but not a visitor
from another planet but one that "was a human-engineered, experimental aircraft
nestled in a Connecticut hangar.
"‘My God, what is that?’ the 20-year-old
Smith wondered. ‘It was standing there on these stilts.’ It reminded Smith of
something out of Orson Welles' 1938 radio broadcast ‘The War of the Worlds,’
about a Martian invasion of Earth.
Armed with U.S. government security
clearance, Smith watched, he says, as the 40-foot-wide elliptical craft hovered
10 feet off the ground and flew away, driven by twin propellers. A pilot lying
in a cramped cockpit guided the craft. Smith, now a retired 72-year-old executive,
recalled the experience during the UFO frenzy created by the 50th anniversary of
the Roswell episode this month.
Does he have proof that a craft like the one
he saw crashed in Roswell during a test flight? No, but he says he believes that
theory is more probable than visitors from outer space.
At the time, Smith was a mechanical-engineering graduate just
out of Penn State University. He was working for Chance-Vought Aircraft in
Stratford, Conn., which was building planes for the U.S. Navy. Smith was testing
the high-altitude bonding of a composite material: wood sandwiched between two
layers of metal.
He says he was curious about what would be built with the
material, and since he had security clearance, a supervisor led him into a
guarded hangar. He was shown a new jet the company was developing, but his
attention was attracted to the other craft in the hangar, a flying saucer made
of the material he had been testing.
‘It was very streamlined,’ Smith recalls. The khaki-coloured
saucer was a few inches thick at the edges to about two feet thick at the
pilot's cockpit, which had a bubble window allowing the pilot to look forward
and down at the ground. ‘I saw him get in, and he lay down flat,’ Smith says.
The craft had two propellers and rudders in the back. Smith went back at night
to watch test flights. The saucer, he says, would float straight up, then fly
off.
|
‘They'd get it off the ground and it would disappear’ into
the darkness, he says. He says there were reports in the area of unidentified
flying objects. About the time he left Chance-Vought in 1947, it moved
operations to Texas, where it would have better conditions for test flights,
Smith says." (24) Thus, Chance-Vought moved to a state next to New Mexico the
year of the Roswell crash.
Other aircraft, at the time, seemed equally unconventional. In
the 1930s and 1940s in Germany, the Horten brothers, Walter and Reimar, built a
range of planes that they called the ‘Ho’ series. The first of this series, the
Ho I, was a simple flying-wing sail plane.
By the end of that decade the brothers had developed the Ho
III, a metal framed glider that was fitted with a folding blade propeller for
flight. Then in 1944 they finished the prototype HO IX, their first combat
intended design, powered by the Junkers Jumo 004B turbojets, the craft had a
metal frame and plywood exterior (Appendix I) It made its maiden flight on 2nd
February 1945 and satisfied with its performance, the Air Ministry ordered forty
of the craft to be built by the Goetha Waggonfabrik under the designation
Ho-229.
When the US Third US Army Corps reached the Goetha plant on 14th
April 1945 they took over the factory, and shipped back to the US the near
completed HO IX V3.
Another similar looking craft was this ‘airplane’ photographed
in Germany at the end of the war.
In fact, many of these German designs seemingly account for many of
the reports of Unidentified Flying Objects seen over the US after the war.
Kenneth Arnold himself described what he saw as a flying disc,
yet when Arnold actually drew a picture of what he had seen, it looked little
like the popularly conceived silver-round disc that readily springs to mind.
In fact, the diagram Kenneth Arnold actually drew of what he
had seen that fateful day in 1947 looks remarkably like the German HO IX or
other craft developed during the war.
George Adamski’s UFOs also have a similar Nazi connection.
This light enhanced frame from a 8mm cine film taken by George Adamski in the
presence of Madeleine Rodeffer (Picture credit: Madeleine Rodeffer) and other
witnesses at Silver Spring, Maryland in February 1965, looks remarkably like the
drawings for the Nazi Haunebu II during the second world war.
Notice the bubble effects under the diagram of the Nazi craft
and those captured in the alleged Adamski UFO. Indeed, it obviously is the
Haunebu craft.
Again, this object photographed in February 1954 by Stephen
Darbishire and his cousin Adrian Myers in the Lake District of England looks
suspiciously like the German craft.
Its contours and design are too much like the Haunebu craft to
be a coincidence, and on the bottom left hand side can be seen one of the
‘bubbles’.
This following picture was drawn following an alleged UFO
touchdown near Kofu City, Yamanshi Prefecture in Japan on 23rd February 1975 –
thirty years after cessation of hostilities in Europe. A ccording
to the artist, an occupant came out of the craft and touched a child on the
shoulder, temporarily paralysing him. (Well, wouldn’t you be startled if an
alien touched you?)
The idea of such flying disks should come as no surprise for
after the war there were a number of such designs in existence.
This craft was developed by the Lockheed Skunk Works in
Palmdale, California.
An unmanned aerial reconnaissance vehicle, it had a saucer
shaped body with long wings and could easily be mistaken for a flying disk when
seen at certain angles.
|
This craft (right - below), is the prototype of a giant ‘flying saucer’
designed to revolutionise air transport. Designed by British firm, Airship
Industries, the Skyship was planned to cruise at about 100 miles an hour at an
altitude of 5000 feet.
It seems likely, therefore, that many of the UFO sighting
reports made after the war can be accounted for by misidentified or unrecognised
German/US designs that were being developed in a secrecy necessitated by firstly
the Cold War and secondly by the fact that most of the technologies were the
result of works undertaken by former Nazi scientists secretly and often
illegally brought into the US.
Yet this cannot account for all of the sightings, for it is
inconceivable that the CIA, NSA, FBI etc. would have been in such a blind panic
as described in previous chapters had the sightings simply been known
terrestrial if unconventional aircraft.
Each agency may not
always have been aware of all developments at all times, but the official
investigation into the UFO phenomena in the US went on officially for over
twenty years, it would not be unrealistic to have expected a terrestrial
explanation to have been circulated within that time frame.
So if
unconventional but terrestrial craft cannot account for many of the sightings –
and the official interest – then what can.
There have
certainly been rumours circulating for many years that the German designs were
actually man-made attempts to reproduce crashed real ‘flying saucers’ - attempts
that failed because the engineers and scientists involved were unable to
recreate the steering and propulsion systems of the alleged crashed craft.
As bizarre as this
sounds, this claim certainly better explains the number of sightings over
hundreds if not thousands of years and the inability of the major governmental
agencies to account for much of the activity in the skies after the war.
And it is a claim
that is backed by some major players on the world stage.
One of the most impressive of those backing this claim is
Colonel Philip J. Corso (Ret.) (Below lft with Edwards O’Connor, Corso, Lt.
Gen. Arthur Trudeau and Victor Fediay.)
|
Corso published a book entitled ‘The Day After Roswell:
A Former Official Reveals the US Government’s Shocking UFO Cover-up’ in
which he makes a number of revelations.
Corso’s background itself is formidable. He was Chief of the US
Army’s Foreign Technology Division, and was a member of President Eisenhower’s
National Security Council. He later went on to work for Senator Strom Thurmond
after retiring from the army in 1963. Corso was interviewed by Michael Lindemann
of CNI News on 5th July 1997 and asked;
ML: There have been rumours and speculations that
Roswell, and what came from Roswell – the way we exploited Roswell
technology – might not have been the very first time such a thing happened.
There have been indications or speculations that the Nazis had done such a
thing, that some of their extraordinary technological developments may have
come from a similar source. What do you think of that?
PC: Yes. True. I had German scientists on my team. I
discussed this with them. I discussed this with Oberth, von Braun. I was
part of ‘Project Paperclip’ with General Trudeau… There were crashes
elsewhere, and they [the Germans] gathered material too. The Germans were
working on it. They didn’t solve the propulsion system. They did a lot of
experiments on flying saucers. They had one that went up to 12,000 feet. But
where all, we and they, missed out was on the guidance system. In R&D we
began to realise that this being [a captured alien] was part of the
guidance system, part of the apparatus himself, or itself, as it had no
sexual organs." In his book Corso also describes the UFO that crashed at
Roswell and noted General Twinning’s observations regarding the design; "The
crescent-shaped craft looked so uncomfortably like the German Horten wings our
flyers had seen at the end of the war that he had to suspect the Germans had
bumped into something we didn’t know about. And his conversations with Wernher
von Braun and Willy Ley at Alamogordo in the days after the crash confirmed
this. They didn’t want to be thought of as verruckt but intimated that
there was a deeper story about what the Germans had engineered." (25)
Certainly this ‘deeper story’ was confirmed by the father of
the modern rocket, Hermann Oberth. He independently confirmed that during the
war years there was a Nazi-Extra-terrestrial connection when he stated, "we
cannot take credit for our record advancement in certain scientific fields
alone. We have been helped." When asked by whom, he replied, "the peoples of
other worlds." (26)
Wernher von Braun was equally frank about the issue and did not
doubt that extraterrestrials were visiting the Earth nor that many of the
advancements he was involved in were a result of back engineering alien
technology. Indeed, he talked openly about the issue following an incident on
3rd June 1959 when the ‘Discoverer III’ failed to achieve
orbit, having been deflected whilst travelling.
Von Braun
commented, "We find ourselves faced by powers, which are far stronger than we
had hitherto assumed, and whose base is at present unknown to us. More I cannot
say at present. We are now engaged in entering into closer contact with those
powers, and in six or nine months it may be possible to speak with some
precision on the matter." (27)
If these reports from Oberth and Von Braun are to be believed,
then clearly the Germans held a knowledge not previously available to the
Western allies. And it appears that the scientists entering the US after the war
under the auspices of Operation Paperclip shared this knowledge with the US
military who within weeks set in place one of the fastest but little known
invasions of the Twentieth Century.
TAGS: German Flying Saucers, Development of German Flying Saucers, German Flying Disks, Nazi War Secrets, German Scientists, Operation Paperclip

(C) VIOLATIONS
1999 - 2010
References:
(1) New York Times 14th December 1944.
(2) Lore, Gordon I. R. Jnr., and Deneault, Harold H., Jnr.,
‘Mysteries of the Skies; UFOs in Perspective’ p. 116 Prentice-Hall, New
Jersey 1968.
(3) ‘Der Spiegel’ magazine 30th March
1950
(4) Third Reich Video
(5) Jungk, Robert, ‘Brighter Than a Thousand Suns’ p.
87
(6) Ibid
(7) Memorandum to Members of the Advisory Committee on Human
Radiation Experiments 5th April 1995, from Advisory Committee Staff ‘Post World
War II Recruitment of German Scientists – Operation Paperclip’
(8) Stuhlinger, Ernest and Ordway, Frederick III, ‘Wernher
von Braun: Crusader for Space’ p. 67 Kreiger Publishing Company, Florida
1994.
(9) Memorandum to Members of the Advisory Committee on Human
Radiation Experiments 5th April 1995, from Advisory Committee Staff ‘Post
World War II Recruitment of German Scientists – Operation Paperclip’
(10) Ibid.
(11) Ibid.
(12) Zapezauer, Mark ‘The CIA’s Greatest Hits’
(13) Memorandum to Members of the Advisory Committee on Human
Radiation Experiments 5th April 1995, from Advisory Committee Staff ‘Post
World War II Recruitment of German Scientists – Operation Paperclip’
(14) Ibid.
(15) Buckbee, Edward O., ‘Biographical Data: Wernher von
Braun’ Alabama Space and Rocket Centre, 1983.
(16) Stuhlinger, Ernest and Ordway, Frederick III, ‘Wernher
von Braun: Crusader for Space’ p.15, Kreiger Publishing Company, Florida
1994.
(17) Bergaust, Erik, ‘Wernher von Braun’ pp51-52,
National Space Institute, Washington DC, 1978.
(18) Dooling, David, ‘Academic American Encyclopaedia’
p. 134 Grolier Inc 1993.
(19) Donefer, Charles, ‘Wernher von Braun: National Hero or
Enemy to the World?’ 1996
(20) Ibid p. 134
(21) Buckbee, Edward O., ‘Biographical Data: Wernher von
Braun’ p. 2 Alabama Space and Rocket Centre, 1983.
(22) Ibid p. 3
(23) DeVorkin, David H., ‘Science With A Vengeance: How the
Military Created the US Space Sciences After World War II’ p. 26,
Springer-Verlag, New York 1992.
(24) Lancaster New Era newspaper, 12th July
1997.
(25) Corso, Philip, ‘The Day After Roswell’ p. 79 Pocket
Books, New York 1997
(26) Collyns, Robin, ‘Did Spacemen Colonise the Earth?’
p. 236, Pelham Books, London 1974.
(27) ‘News Europa’ Jan 1959
 |