This ‘photograph’ billed, as ‘the most remarkable photograph ever taken’ (41) was considered by the hollow earth theorists to be incontrovertible proof that the Earth is indeed hollow apparently showing a massive ‘hole as the pole.’ However, the picture was not all it appeared, for the ‘photograph’ was actually a mosaic of television images taken during a twenty-four hour period at differing points along the satellite’s orbit. The images were later processed by computer and reassembled to form a composite view of Earth as if seen from a single point directly over the North Pole. During this time the regions near the Pole were shrouded by the continuous darkness of the arctic winter, thus the unlighted area around the pole. Yet the Hollow Earth believers, and yes they still do exist, continue to present evidence which, in their view supports the theory. The two photographs below both show a depressed area near the pole that is allegedly the opening to the hollow world. Check out more here.
Given that there is no obvious location for the missing civilisation – either on the Earth or in it (!) – some researchers have suggested that all evidence has been wiped out by a natural disaster than befell the world in prehistory. Indeed the great flood of the Bible is even cited as one of the consequences of this disaster and a find in the frozen wastelands of Siberia at the turn of the Twentieth Century provides tantalising clues as to what may have happened. TAGS: Atlantis the Lost Continent, Atlantis the Lost Continent Theories, Cyrus Teed Theories, Hollow Earth Hypothesis, Forbidden Ancient Knowledge, Hollow Eath Theories
(C) VIOLATIONS 1999 - 2009 References (1) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' p.14 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (2) Berlitz C, 'Mystery of Atlantis' p. 53 Souvenir Press London 1977 (3) Berlitz C, 'Mystery of Atlantis' pp. 57-8 Souvenir Press London 1977 (4) Scientific American 28th July 1877. (5) Berlitz C, 'Mystery of Atlantis' pp. 66-7 Souvenir Press London 1977 (6) Hope, M 'Atlantis, 'Myth or Reality?' p. 80 Arkana, London 1991 (7) Hope, M 'Atlantis, 'Myth or Reality?' p. 81 Arkana, London 1991 (8) Hope, M 'Atlantis, 'Myth or Reality?' p. 81 Arkana, London 1991 (9) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' pp. 15-16 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (10) Termier, Pierre, ‘L’Atlantide’, Monaco 1913. (11) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' p.15 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (12) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' p.15 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (13) Geographical Society of America Bulletins No. 60 (1949) and 65 (1954). (14) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' p.14 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (15) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' p.14 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (16) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' p.14 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (17) The Miami News 23rd August 1968, the Miami Herald 11th September 1968. (18) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' p.14 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (19) Ibid (20) Richards Douglas G, ‘Archaeological Anomalies in the Bahamas’, Journal of Scientific Exploration 2:181, 1988. (21) Hope, M 'Atlantis, 'Myth or Reality?' p. 233 Arkana, London 1991 (22) Tomas, A, 'Atlantis From Legend to Discovery' p.122 Sphere Aylesbury 1973 (23) Ball, Mahlon M., and Gifford, John A., 1980, ‘Investigation of Submerged Beachrock Deposits Off Bimini, Bahamas’ Research Reports National Geographical Society, Vol. 12. P21-38 (24) Gifford, John A, 1973, ‘A Description of the Geology of the Bimini islands, Bahamas’, University of Miami, Florida pp11-12 (25) McKusick, M., and Shinn, E.A., 1980 ‘Bahamian Atlantis Reconsidered’, Nature, Vol. 287 No 5777 pp 11-12 (26) Kye, Charles A., 1959, ‘Shoreline Features and Quaternary Shoreline Changes, Puerto Rico’ US Geological Survey Professional paper No. 317-B, pp 49-140. (27) McLean, Roger F., 1964, ‘A Regional Study of the Distribution, Forms, Processes, and rates of Mechanical and Biological Erosion of a Carbonate Clastic Rock in the Littoral Zone.’ Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University. (28) Ball, Mahlon M., and Gifford, John A., 1980, ‘Investigation of Submerged Beachrock Deposits Off Bimini, Bahamas’ Research Reports National Geographical Society, Vol. 12. P21-38 (29) Strasser, A., and Davaud, E., 1986, ‘Formation of Holocene Limestone Sequences by Progradation, Cementation and Erosion; Two Examples from the Bahamas’ Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, Vole 56 No 3 p 422-428 (30) McKusick, M., and Shinn, E.A., 1980 ‘Bahamian Atlantis Reconsidered’, Nature, Vol. 287 No 5777 pp 11-12 (31) Randi, J., ‘Atlantean Road: the Bimini Beach Rock’ Skepical Inquirer Vol. 5 No. 3 pp 42-43 1981 (32) Kolosimo, Peter, ‘Timeless Earth’ p.40 (33) Wilkins, Harold T., ‘Mysteries of Ancient South America’ pp.169-170. (34) Wilkins, Harold T., ‘Mysteries of Ancient South America’ p.175 (35) Stemman, R, 'Mysteries of the Universe' p. 162 Book Club Associates LOndon 1980 (36) Fate and Fortune Magazine p. 40 #2 1974. (37) New York Times 8th November 1967 p. 2 (38) Amazing Stories pp 171-2 Oct 1947. (39) Omni Magazine, October 1983. (40) 'Mystic places' p. 147 Time Life Books, (41) Trench, Brinsley, ‘Secret of the Ages’ p.116 Panther, 1976 Other References Quoted: Harrison, W., 1971, ‘Atlantis Undiscovered; Bimini, Bahamas’, Nature Vol. 230 No 5292 p.287-289 Davaud, Eric and Strasser, A., 1984, ‘Progradation, Cimentation, Erosion; Evolution Sedimentaire et Diagenetique Recente d’un Littoral Carbonate (Bimini, Bahamas)'. (Translated title; ‘Progradation, Cementation, Erosion; Recent Diagenetic and Sedimentary Evolution in a carbonate Coastal Environment, Bimini, Bahamas.) Ecologae Geologicae Helvetica, Vol. 77 No 3, pp 449-468 Shin, E. A., 1978, ‘Untitled’ Sea Frontiers, Vole 24, p130 Supko, P. R., Marszalek, D. S., and Bock, W. D., 1970 ‘Sedimentary Environments and Carbonate Rocks of Bimini, Bahamas’ Miami Geographical Society Annual Field Trip, Guidebook No 4, p.30, Miami Geological Society, Miami, Florida. Appendix I 1. The three features are unconnected at the southwest end; scattered blocks are present there but do not form a well-defined linear feature connecting the seaward, middle and shoreward features. No evidence exists anywhere over the three features of two courses of blocks, or even a single block set squarely atop another. Not enough blocks lie in the vicinity of the three features to have formed a now-destroyed second course of blocks. Bedrock closely underlies the entire area of the three features eliminating the possibility of excavations or channels between them. Indications are that the blocks of the inner and middle features have always rested on a layer of loose sand. No evidence was found of the blocks being cut into or founded on the underlying bedrock surface. In areas of the seaward feature where blocks rest directly on the bedrock surface, no evidence was found of regular or symmetrical supports beneath any of the rocks. We saw no evidence on any of the blocks of regular or repeated patterns of grooves or depressions that might be interpreted as tool marks. The inner and middle features are continuous only over a distance of about 50 meters. Though the seaward feature extends several hundred meters further to the north east, it too is not well founded or continuous enough to have served as some kind of thoroughfare. In fact, the only attributes of the three linear features that suggest a human origin are the regular shapes of some of the blocks. These are also attributes of natural bedrock deposits. (11) |





